VibePackr
Website menu
POC / EVALUATE ONE QUESTION Documentation · R1

PoC Guide: plan, run, evaluate and close

Choose one evaluation question, follow a supported route, compare the evidence with your criteria, then close costs, resources and open issues.

English review edition · Recorded example: local R234 · Existing-operator reproduction requires a matching authorized installation.

New to Guide Packs?See the structure, safe-use boundaries and Packtory listing purpose → These are documentation packages; reading them does not grant product operation authority.

Choose one question and one route

  1. Plan
  2. Resolve prerequisites
  3. Read or reproduce
  4. Evaluate
  5. Close and hand off

Choose the route your installation and evidence support. Keep the question small enough to judge from one clear result.

Available now as a read-through of the public retained local R234 record.

Read one recorded Work

Question
Can I explain how one supported audit operation is traced to its report and pending human acceptance?
Bring
The six-step recorded-run reader, Blank input, observation and run-record worksheets, The evaluation criteria below
Expected output
A completed reading record with cited product facts, a separate human assessment and an owner handoff for any proposed reproduction.
Scope
No installation is needed to read. The historical operation does not establish customer access, AI quality or a new file/runtime check.
Read the route reference →
Conditional: an already authorized operator must confirm the exact matching installation and all operation prerequisites first.

Reproduce the supported local audit operation

Question
On this eligible installation, can one approved CREATE_AUDIT_ARTIFACT Work be followed to readable, matching JSON/PDF reports?
Bring
Supplied client path, local endpoint and exact service release, Operation permission, one unused approved key and private output directory, Exact operation CREATE_AUDIT_ARTIFACT and intent create audit artifact, Approved report access, reviewer and lifecycle/cost owners
Expected output
Your own returned Work/result observations, same-Work comparison, readable file checks and a separate reviewer decision; success is not prefilled.
Scope
This operation creates a structured local audit artifact. It does not analyze an arbitrary business attachment or validate a customer AI/provider setup.
Read the route reference →
Planning is available now. Fresh r232 administrator-dependent use stops at C7; customer AI/storage/lifecycle procedures and matching proof remain prerequisites.

Prepare a new-customer AI evaluation

Question
Which supported task, input, quality measure, cost limit and customer setup proof are needed to answer our business question?
Bring
One business question and approved non-confidential sample description, Requested supported task/model/location and expected deliverable, Proposed quality/time/cost criteria with named owners, Exact delivery and missing-procedure request references, or explicit unknowns
Expected output
A scoped evaluation brief, proposed measurable criteria and a missing-prerequisite handoff. Operational observations stay blank until a supported, authorized customer route is proven.
Scope
No runnable AI payload or customer setup is supplied by this audit workbook. Obtain the supported version-specific procedure and validate its result before claiming business value.
Read the route reference →

Collect the operating handoff

InputOwnerConfirm
Exact delivery version and supported installation routeDelivery contactMatches target; new r232 first-admin C7 remains unresolved
One permitted operation and acceptance criteriaPoC owner and product administratorWritten scope and operation permission; no health-only inference
Client, service, account and endpointAppliance operatorMatching local client/service and supplied socket; no invented startup
Non-secret input and retention choicesData ownerApproved input and private report handling
AI model, identity, network and cost if neededCloud/AI ownerSupported customer procedure and actual work validation; not proven by local audit
Report access and human reviewService operator and named reviewerReadable authorized artifacts and explicit review responsibility

Put missing inputs in the issue handoff with an owner and resume condition. Store references, not secrets.

See one Work before planning your own

Actual retained record · local R234

The existing six-step reader follows one local Work, its JSON/PDF reports and pending human acceptance. Use it to understand what you will inspect.

The completed example is an illustrative worksheet built around cited historical facts. It is not a new execution or customer result.

STEP 01

Choose one question worth answering

planning

Agree what the evaluation will teach you before spending or submitting.

Bring

  • Named PoC owner and reviewer
  • Non-confidential sample and intended use

Follow the sequence

  1. Choose either reading the retained audit example or, if already eligible, reproducing the supported audit operation. CREATE_AUDIT_ARTIFACT creates a structured local audit artifact; it does not audit arbitrary attached documents.
  2. Write acceptance criteria, budget, permitted actions and stop conditions. Separate a desired AI use case from this local audit example.
  3. Assign cloud, AI, data, product access and service-operation responsibilities. One person may fill several responsibilities; each requires its own access.
  4. Use the evaluation workbook to turn each criterion into an observable expectation, a check and an evidence reference. Agree any task-quality, time or cost threshold before execution; there is no default product pass score.

Check the result

  • A chosen route, exact question, criterion plan, named owners, planned budget and stop conditions. Actual observations remain blank.

If it does not match

  • Unclear authority, cost owner or sensitive input: resolve with the PoC/data owner before operational work.

Keep for the handoff

  • Planning worksheet and unresolved dependencies

Define observable criteria →

STEP 02

Choose the route your evidence supports

planning

Avoid treating a recorded example as a customer installation procedure.

Bring

  • Delivery version and environment, or an explicit unknown

Follow the sequence

  1. New r232 customer: prepare the plan and request the matching Marketplace/deployment/first-administrator procedures. Stop administrator-dependent use at C7.
  2. Existing authorized installation: obtain the handoff in step 4 and confirm the operation is supported for its exact release.
  3. Read the retained local R234 example now even if operational prerequisites are missing. No account, endpoint or provider is needed to read it.

Check the result

  • A recorded route choice: planning, retained-run reading, or conditional existing-operator reproduction.

If it does not match

  • Do not infer product authority from SSH, Cloud IAM, OS root, purchase or a running VM.

Keep for the handoff

  • Chosen route, release, missing procedure and responsible contact
STEP 03

Read one actual Work before trying your own

retained run

Recognize the action, outcome and limits of the retained example.

Bring

  • Bundled Headless guide and six-step recorded-run reader

Follow the sequence

  1. Open headless-worked-run-en.html; then read the tutorial sections of the Headless reference. This is selected actual output, not a live terminal.
  2. Follow the successful wording create audit artifact through submission, list, show, report and file checks. Read the earlier rejected wording only as history; do not execute it as a test.
  3. Notice the health exit 1/UNKNOWN observations and separately approved admission in that specific lab. That history is not permission to ignore your own missing readiness requirement.

Check the result

  • The recorded report has execution_count 1, validation_results PASSED, final_result AUTOMATION_COMPLETED_HUMAN_ACCEPTANCE_PENDING and closure.human_acceptance null.
  • The service was stopped after collection. Conversational approval did not change the product’s observed AWAITING_HUMAN_ACCEPTANCE state.

If it does not match

  • Do not copy the recorded Work ID, endpoint or digests into a new execution.
  • This R234 local record is neither r232 customer proof nor a production AI result.

Keep for the handoff

  • Notes separating observed result, pending human acceptance and applicability to your installation
STEP 04

Obtain an operating handoff

conditional existing operator

Make an eligible reproduction concrete without inventing setup commands.

Bring

  • Matching installed client/service release
  • Authorized local account and private writable working directory

Follow the sequence

  1. Ask delivery for the installed packrctl location and exact service release. Ask the service operator for its absolute local socket and running-state confirmation.
  2. Ask the product administrator to confirm CREATE_AUDIT_ARTIFACT permission; ask the Work owner for one unused approved key and a reviewer.
  3. Confirm access to returned report files or an approved copy procedure. A local socket is not a remote connection; a desktop terminal does not automatically reach the appliance.
  4. For a separate AI PoC, obtain supported model/location, identity/access, billing limit and storage/retention procedure. This audit example does not validate those connections or incur demonstrated AI usage.
  5. List each missing handoff item in the issue sheet with its owner, required evidence and resume condition. Planning and recorded reading can continue independently.

Check the result

  • Every required handoff item has an owner and a verifiable value for the intended installation.

If it does not match

  • Missing startup/admin/AI/storage procedure: request it; do not create keys, grants, sandbox state or replacement binaries.
  • The separately repaired Admin demonstration candidate is not an existing Golden-operational complement or customer bootstrap.

Keep for the handoff

  • Version, target, approved scope and non-secret handoff confirmation; keep private endpoint/account details local

Record the missing handoff →

STEP 05

Query the same service and decide whether to stop

conditional existing operator

Record actual status and component reasons before submission.

Bring

  • Completed handoff
  • Fresh private output directory

Follow the sequence

  1. In the supplied local client environment, replace both absolute path placeholders, then use the baseline block. Keep the same shell/account/socket for following steps.
  2. Read status.json and health.json locally. Record both printed status_exit and health_exit values, plus each relevant state/reason. The snippet captures each exit immediately after its command. A zero exit does not grant Work authority.
  3. If requirements are unknown or non-ready, ask the component owner to resolve applicability before submitting; do not repeat the lab’s exception by assumption.
Operator reference · copy does not execute
PACKRCTL="/ABSOLUTE/SUPPLIED/PATH/packrctl"
SOCKET="/ABSOLUTE/SUPPLIED/PATH/control-plane.sock"
"$PACKRCTL" --help
"$PACKRCTL" --socket "$SOCKET" status --json > status.json
STATUS_EXIT=$?
"$PACKRCTL" --socket "$SOCKET" health --json > health.json
HEALTH_EXIT=$?
printf 'status_exit=%s\nhealth_exit=%s\n' "$STATUS_EXIT" "$HEALTH_EXIT"

Check the result

  • A timestamped baseline with liveness, readiness, authority/runtime observations and exit code.

If it does not match

  • Missing command: delivery/operator verifies installation path. Transport failure: operator checks endpoint/service. Authorization denial: administrator reviews binding.
  • Do not turn nonzero health into an automatic restart.

Keep for the handoff

  • Sanitized baseline summary; raw response files remain private

Resolve a failed check →

STEP 06

Submit one explicitly permitted audit operation

conditional existing operator

Create one intentional Work and keep its returned identity.

Bring

  • All operation-specific prerequisites resolved
  • Unused approved key

Follow the sequence

  1. Replace the key placeholder and keep the supported intent exactly as shown. Execute the submit block only for the separately authorized reproduction; reading this package does not submit anything.
  2. Open work-run.json locally. Save result.work.work_id with your key and exit code.
  3. The convenience command prepares and executes and writes records. Do not treat it as a read-only probe or generic AI prompt runner.
Operator reference · copy does not execute
WORK_KEY="REPLACE_WITH_ONE_UNUSED_APPROVED_KEY"
"$PACKRCTL" --socket "$SOCKET" work run CREATE_AUDIT_ARTIFACT "create audit artifact" "$WORK_KEY" --json > work-run.json
RUN_EXIT=$?
printf '%s\n' "$RUN_EXIT"

Check the result

  • A response whose Work identity and outcome can be inspected; do not pre-fill success.

If it does not match

  • Timeout, missing ID, DENIED, STOP_WITH_FINDING, FAILED or PARTIAL: preserve the result and reconcile before further action.
  • execution_retry_allowed false forbids automatic retry. Re-running the helper is not exact prepared-envelope replay.

Keep for the handoff

  • Original key/request context, time, exit and exact returned Work ID
STEP 07

Reconcile and inspect that same Work

conditional existing operator

Prevent a second execution from being mistaken for recovery.

Bring

  • Exact returned result.work.work_id

Follow the sequence

  1. Paste your own Work ID in the query block; keep the original account and socket.
  2. Compare works[].work_id in list with work.work_id, reports[].work_id and selected_report.canonical_report.work_id in show.
  3. If absent from the last 10, show the saved ID directly or use the documented list limit up to 100. An empty scoped list is not proof of no Work anywhere.
  4. If submission returned no ID, preserve request context and ask support to reconcile the original installation/principal before another submission.
Operator reference · copy does not execute
WORK_ID="PASTE_EXACT_result.work.work_id_FROM_work-run.json"
"$PACKRCTL" --socket "$SOCKET" work list --limit 10 --json > work-list.json
"$PACKRCTL" --socket "$SOCKET" work show "$WORK_ID" --json > work-show.json

Check the result

  • All inspected records refer to one saved Work; ambiguity is recorded rather than replaced by a new Work.

If it does not match

  • Identity mismatch, denied show or missing selected report: stop completion claims. Do not switch accounts to bypass a denial.

Keep for the handoff

  • Work ID, chosen report revision and sanitized reconciliation result
STEP 08

Read validation, receipt and closure together

conditional existing operator

Separate automated completion from human acceptance.

Bring

  • Same-Work show response

Follow the sequence

  1. Read selected_report.canonical_report: work_id, execution_count, final_result, validation_results, receipt and closure. Retain actual values, not the example’s expected values.
  2. Read closure.disposition, closure.human_acceptance_required and closure.human_acceptance. Read replayed and execution_retry_allowed in the returned result.
  3. PASSED is validation, not human acceptance. A replayed result is not a new execution. Missing receipt/closure needs support reconciliation.
  4. Use the criterion observation sheet to distinguish the expected value from the literal value observed. Mark an unperformed check as not run; give a reason for non-applicability. These are human worksheet labels, not product status.

Check the result

  • An accurate outcome statement; the retained example is automation completed with human acceptance pending.

If it does not match

  • Do not call FAILED/PARTIAL unchanged state or call a process exit product success.

Keep for the handoff

  • Sanitized outcome and pending reviewer decision
STEP 09

Obtain and verify the JSON and PDF

conditional existing operator

Review readable artifacts for the exact Work and revision.

Bring

  • selected_report.json_path and selected_report.pdf_path
  • Authorized local viewer or operator-supplied approved copies

Follow the sequence

  1. Use your returned paths, never a guessed report directory. Confirm files exist, are readable and match the selected Work/revision.
  2. On macOS the shared checksum block uses shasum; otherwise use the file verifier supplied for your platform. Compare JSON bytes to selected_report.projection.json_file_sha256 and PDF bytes to selected_report.projection.pdf_sha256, removing its sha256: prefix for comparison.
  3. Keep report_sha256 distinct from file hashes. It is the report digest, not the checksum of the saved JSON or PDF.
  4. Open the PDF in an authorized viewer and compare Work, execution count and validation with JSON. A server path is not proof of delivery to your computer.
Operator reference · copy does not execute
REPORT_JSON="PASTE_EXACT_selected_report.json_path"
REPORT_PDF="PASTE_EXACT_selected_report.pdf_path"
shasum -a 256 "$REPORT_JSON" "$REPORT_PDF"

Check the result

  • Matched, readable JSON/PDF for one report revision. No separate underlying output artifact is promised by this step.

If it does not match

  • Missing/unreadable file or digest mismatch: retain the reference and ask the service operator/support; do not silently regenerate or substitute another report.

Keep for the handoff

  • Report revision, comparison result and minimal approved references; raw reports stay private
STEP 10

Review usefulness and record the human decision

planning

Answer the original PoC question without changing product acceptance by implication.

Bring

  • Plan criteria
  • Retained-run notes or actual eligible reproduction results

Follow the sequence

  1. The named reviewer compares the result with the agreed goal, permitted input, cost and retention boundaries. For the audit example, judge the structured artifact/report trace, not arbitrary content quality.
  2. Record the human’s review separately from the product’s latest closure state. This guide supplies no product acceptance command.
  3. If no provider was called or billing evidence was not collected, record not measured/not applicable with the reason; do not invent a cost or runtime result.
  4. Complete the criterion-by-criterion evaluation and the final human review: what was learned, what remains blocked, which owner acts next and what evidence would change the decision. Do not reduce unresolved required criteria to an average score.

Check the result

  • A signed-off or unresolved human evaluation record and the separately observed product acceptance state.

If it does not match

  • A conversation approval or completed checklist must not overwrite AWAITING_HUMAN_ACCEPTANCE in reporting.

Keep for the handoff

  • Reviewer, date, criteria result, open issues and product state
  • Completed criterion observations and final human review, or an explicitly unresolved disposition

Write the final evaluation →

STEP 11

Close the exercise and hand off remaining work

planning

Preserve required results and leave resources in an agreed state.

Bring

  • Exact resources used
  • Data owner retention choices
  • Operator’s supported stop/retirement procedure

Follow the sequence

  1. Reading-only route: retain your worksheet; there is no product process to stop.
  2. Operational route: ask the service operator to stop only an exercise-owned service when authorized by its supplied procedure. A closed GUI does not prove service shutdown.
  3. Have cloud/data owners review VM, disks, objects, backups and continuing charges separately. This guide provides no deletion or credential-revocation command.
  4. Send support the version, failed stage, expected/observed result, time, literal sanitized reason and minimal Work/report reference. Request a private channel before extra identifiers.
  5. Complete one closeout row for each used resource. Record before/after state, retained data, owner, retention review date, remaining charges and evidence. Compare actual cost over a named billing period with the agreed budget; unknown or delayed billing remains unmeasured.

Check the result

  • A completed closeout or an explicitly open item for each resource and cost line, plus a named owner and resume condition for every unresolved issue.

If it does not match

  • Unknown ownership or retention effect: stop deletion/restarts and ask the responsible owner. Never reuse test teardown as customer cleanup proof.

Keep for the handoff

  • Cleanup confirmations, retained-report location kept private, outstanding owner/action

Close resources and remaining costs →

Take the guide with you

Use the blank files for your own PoC. The completed example is labeled separately.

Original R0 offline reference edition remains unchanged. Use the R1 workbook for the current criteria and corrected baseline reference.

From a blank plan to a completed reading example

The new completed example follows the same criteria through planning, evidence review, cost applicability, open issues and a final human note.

Open the completed example →

Common questions

Can I start if health exits 1 as in the recorded run?

No general permission follows from that history. The lab had separate approval and normal admission evaluated that operation. Resolve your own required readiness and authority before submission.

Is this an executable Pack I can import into Packtory?

No. This is a documentation package. It is not a registered payload, installed Pack, authority grant or product execution.

Can the audit command analyze my uploaded business document?

This registered operation creates a structured local audit artifact. It does not inspect arbitrary attached content.

What if the command times out?

Keep the key/request context and reconcile the original Work under the same installation/account. Do not submit a replacement or add an automatic retry.

Does the repaired Admin example unblock Golden r232?

No. It used a separately repaired task-local candidate and disposable target. It is not a Golden change, customer bootstrap or inherited production capability.

What do I send support?

Version, stage, expected and observed behavior, time and sanitized reason; minimal Work/report reference when appropriate. No credentials, raw reports, private paths, full logs or customer payloads.

Scope of this edition

  • Documentation review edition; blank worksheets and the illustrative reading example do not execute or register a Pack.
  • Golden r232 remains immutable. New-customer C7 and full customer AI/storage/lifecycle procedures are not completed here.
  • Local R234 recorded Work is bounded evidence; this package creates no new runtime or production evidence.
  • Repaired Admin candidate complements the reference material, not the operational capabilities of existing Golden installations.
  • Commands follow the active Headless reference. R1 adds immediate status exit capture to the baseline snippet; retained historical outputs and the original R0 archive are unchanged. No historical rejected input is offered as a runnable test.
  • Raw JSON/PDF, execution responses, credentials and internal support exports are not public attachments.
  • Human review and product acceptance are separate; unknown values remain unknown.